![wifiperf utility wifiperf utility](https://www.accessagility.com/hubfs/Images/Blog%20Posts/WiFiScanner%20for%20iOS/iOS-WiFi-Scanning-thumb-1.png)
RF environments are dynamic and change all the time from minute to minute and hour to hour. Testing in an environment with lots of RF interference is not a level playing field for the solutions you are evaluating.
![wifiperf utility wifiperf utility](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/WiFiPerf_5.jpg)
This is a critical piece of the evaluation because you need to control this environment as much as possible. In house at SecurEdge Networks we use an assessment application from Ixia that runs on the wireless devices and generates actual application traffic like voice, video and data and measures performance against industry established best practice SLA’s. You can also use iPerf3 in server mode on a wired desktop and run iPerf3 on a wireless client running in client mode to do throughput testing on laptops. We use iPerf3 and WiFiPerf from Access Agility to do throughput testing on iOS devices. You can also use some bandwidth generating test applications like iPerf/jPerf. You can stream to multiple clients this way if you want to load stress the evaluation. Load the file up with the Plex application on a wired desktop and then use VLC streamer on the iPad to watch the file. Use Handbrake to prepare a video file using the iPad profile.
![wifiperf utility wifiperf utility](https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Purple118/v4/a4/45/3f/a4453f54-8752-0ff1-28cd-e32d93f21791/source/512x512bb.jpg)
Stream a video from a local server using Plex on a local wired desktop and VLC streamer on the iPad tablet. Will it be a teaching application, a video, a medical application, etc…? Identify the applications you will test with.Īgain, this should mimic the real world as much as possible. An iPad will generally use up to 3x the amount of air time than a laptop with a three stream (3x3) chipset.Ģ. Single stream (1x1) devices will take up more air time than dual or three stream devices will to do the same thing. Keep in mind that the type of devices you use for testing will impact air time utilization of the network. Then stay consistent and use the same device mix across the solutions during the evaluation. Here is what a demographic for a wireless network might look like 50% laptops (802.11n 2x2), 25% tablets (802.11n 1x1), 25% mobile phones (802.11n 1x1). Choose a demographic of what the environment will most likely be and test with that. Each type of device has performance characteristics that impact the performance of the wireless network. This should mimic what you expect the users to be using as close as possible. Establish which devices you will test with.
#Wifiperf utility software#
*note: these suggestions are made for those with limited budgets who lack the lab environments or high end enterprise testing software to do detailed, in depth spectrum analysis, packet analysis and capacity loading of wireless network solutions.ġ.
#Wifiperf utility how to#
With that in mind here are some suggestions for how to properly evaluate a wireless solution that you would want to deploy in your school or business. I also know that my evaluation is only as good as the criteria I have set forth to measure it with and the process by which I will conduct the evaluation. However, I know how to distinguish between abnormal (pronounced Abbey Normal) and normal when conducting a product evaluation. My lineage is made up of mostly civil servants, teachers and some mechanical engineers. I don’t come from a long line of distinguished scientists or researchers like the Frankenstein’s (pronounced Fronk N Steen).